US inaction in Syria has a cost
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 05 September 2012, Wednesday 14 0 0 0
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
s.kiniklioglu@todayszaman.com

US inaction in Syria has a cost

Last week I heard a Washington insider pointing out that there are “no votes for Syria,” indicating that there are no domestic political gains to be made from a more robust Syria policy by the US. He was probably right. As we all know by now, apart from senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman, there are few who raise the issue in the US capital. Fully involved in the presidential race, the US political class is busy and could not care less about what is happening in Syria. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issues tough statements from time to time; Ambassador Susan E. Rice projects sensitivity through her hyper-active twitter account; and when there is a need Gen. David Howell Petraeus visits us every six months or so to demonstrate that the US is on the ball. In reality though, if there is any US action in Syria, it will be next year, namely once the presidential election is over. The region is going through a historic period, but we are all expected to behave according to the US presidential calendar. There is one problem: The events on the ground are not motivated or impacted by the presidential calendar in the US. Just as the Israelis are told to wait until after November to bomb Iran, so are we told to be patient for a buffer zone or no-fly zone in Syria. Life is ordered to wait for the outcome of what has been one of the dullest presidential campaigns I have ever seen. Hundreds killed on a daily basis seem to have no meaning in the US political context.

Syria has the misfortune of bad timing. International powers that recently took military action in Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan have little stomach for another military conflict, and Western populations are weary of armed conflict. There is a significant US opinion that the US cannot fix the problems of the world. Unlike in Libya, the Europeans are not pressing the US to take action. It is only Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar that urge Washington to be more forthcoming. That does not seem to cut it. The problem is Ankara is becoming increasingly impatient. We now have more than 80,000 refugees in our territory. Order in the camps is precarious, and our Syria policy is under heavy domestic political fire. Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) terror -- supported by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad -- is claiming the lives of Turkish citizens on a daily basis. Pressure is building up on the government to act boldly. Turkey is frustrated with the position it now finds itself in. Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu's plea to seek a solution to the refugee crisis has fallen on deaf ears. Ankara wants more US and/or NATO support against the PKK and Assad.

In the absence of the US coming forward, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Turkey are trying to coordinate a negotiated solution to the Syrian crisis. If the plan gains traction the US should not blame anyone for not consulting with it properly. Anyone who has a slight understanding of Middle East politics knows that Syria is a critical country in the Middle Eastern context. Libya was a sideshow in comparison to what change in Syria means for the region. The US needs to respond to Turkish grievances emanating from the Syrian crisis. US allies Turkey and Jordan are increasingly overburdened by the refugee crisis and the concomitant deterioration of the security situation.

Either a regional plan will facilitate a transition or the armed struggle on the ground will force it. For the Syrian opposition to defeat the Syrian army, it will need more sophisticated weapons. Non-lethal communications equipment will not do it. Barring these two options we will watch the carnage and will probably confront an even more complicated situation next year. Also, the US should not be surprised if a public outburst against US inaction develops in Turkey. What Turks see right now is that it is being left alone against Syria, Iran, the PKK and Russia's policy on Syria. Worse, there are some who smell ill intent in all of this.

COMMENTS
Sounds like a bit of wishful thinking on your part HAJRUDIN. Don't bet on it!
Me
we should admit that USA doesnt have the power it had. USA is too frightend to intervine in Suriya.
hajrudin
USA =350 million people. Muslim countries = about 2 billion. How about Muslims take care of their own and stop relying on America for everything and at the same time chant death to America.
huh?
@TruthSeeker, so right!
Orli
thanks to turkey's quarrels with israel it no longer has any influence with america. turkey must become friends with israel again if it wants to progress.
jeevan
I do not know if there is ill intent on the part of the Americans or not. That odor seens stronger from Israel. What is clear to me is that a weak Syria, like a weak Iraq, has always been in the interest of Israel and the U.S.A. That is a major factor behind the longevity of the Assad regime. Thei...
William Peachy
The analysis on the US election is probably accurate, but the final sentences are a bit hypocritical. A majority of Turks believe the US is in control of world affairs through an interventionist foreign policy and covert dealings to solidify its power. It is a no win for the US to either intervene o...
USyabanci
The blame is on America's Muslim allies most notably Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey. These 5 Muslim nations should be flooding Syria with anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons. Instead, the governments of these nations, like obedient little puppies, don't carry out their obligations (t...
Ahmed; Aleppo, Syria
Mr Davutoglu said that 'Turkey would be leading and shaping the Arab spring' - I didn't realise he actually meant - If we can get a free ride on the bloody coattails of America!
poser
Too funny. When the USA does something they are blamed for all the world problems. When they don't do anything they also get blamed for everything. Lose-lose situation. Figure that riddle out. If Turkey wants to be considered a raising power why can't they figure out anything especially in thei...
Truth Seeker
Yes, it has a price, but I am sure that Washington will let Turkey "demonstrate leadership," and bear "the responsibilities that come with its enhanced status." A stick in time could not have saved nine for Turkey, it had the potential to be the basis for something more profound: the transformation...
Jack Kalpakian
The truth is that Turks didn't have the acumen to avoid the situation they have created for themselves. For too long they have boasted about their economic and military prowess, but now the time has come to "put up or shutup" they are found miserably lacking and on their knees begging embarrassingly...
Lawrence of Arabia
US killing saddam hussein=bad? US killing Assad=good? Is that because Saddam killed over 300 000 of his own people and also attacked peaceful neighbours?
confused
In the past, Turkey could rely on Israeli support to get its wishes in Washington. Today? Not so much, thanks to Mr. Erdogan and Mr. Davutoglu.
Yavuz
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
12 June 2013
Pluralism vs. majoritarianism: the emergence of a new Turkey
6 June 2013
Democrats, liberals and the AK Party
27 May 2013
Abdullah Gül and the Emperor's New Clothes
22 May 2013
Syria after Erdoğan's Washington trip
15 May 2013
The Syria file
8 May 2013
The ‘cementization' of Turkish cities
24 April 2013
The Tsarnaev brothers, terror and Chechnya
10 April 2013
Longing for the reasonable
3 April 2013
Entertaining the Kurdish card
27 March 2013
New Atlanticism, Russia and Turkey
13 March 2013
Turkey in the Middle East: an assessment
7 March 2013
Can Turkey's conservatives consolidate Turkish democracy?
22 February 2013
What will be left of Syria?
13 February 2013
Twitter and politics
6 February 2013
Munich, Turkey and European security
30 January 2013
What is Turkey's yardstick?
23 January 2013
European security and Turkey
17 January 2013
Turkey and Russia in an evolving region
9 January 2013
And winter came…
2 January 2013
Presidential system blues
26 December 2012
2012: Divisions exacerbated – democracy not consolidated
19 December 2012
Is Turkey a Middle Eastern country?
13 December 2012
Sobering experiences in Europe
5 December 2012
Turkey in Brussels
28 November 2012
The Turkey talk in Washington
21 November 2012
Halifax, Washington and Turkey-US relations
14 November 2012
Turkey, US and the new Syrian opposition
7 November 2012
Barack back to office, Turkey back to tension
31 October 2012
The US presidential election and Turkey
24 October 2012
Letters from the Black Sea
18 October 2012
Diets, obesity and the utilization of the EU
11 October 2012
Turkey's foreign policy identity
3 October 2012
The convention and the party
26 September 2012
The Arab Awakening: Phase II
19 September 2012
Turks and Kurds: Yearning for a new republic?
12 September 2012
Turkey needs urgent defense reform
5 September 2012
US inaction in Syria has a cost
29 August 2012
Kürecik
22 August 2012
We are at war with Syria
15 August 2012
The Syrian uprising is reconfiguring the region
8 August 2012
Sobering on Iran
1 August 2012
In defense of Davutoğlu
25 July 2012
Political culture
18 July 2012
Turkish politics gearing up for 2014
11 July 2012
How Syria divided Turkey’s conservatives
4 July 2012
The Syrian imbroglio
20 June 2012
Turkey’s Kurdish issue: Yet again we fail
13 June 2012
The Balkans, Turkey and Europe
6 June 2012
Turkey and Europe: Time for an amicable divorce?
30 May 2012
Are liberal politics possible?
23 May 2012
Qatar
16 May 2012
Back to a barbarian age
9 May 2012
Putin 2.0
2 May 2012
Spring and the historic process of revolution
20 April 2012
Politics without opposition
18 April 2012
Traumatized we stand
13 April 2012
The vagaries of exploiting foreign policy
11 April 2012
What is about to happen in Syria?
6 April 2012
Turkey’s Iran issue: The end of Turkish romanticism
4 April 2012
Russia’s ‘principled stance’ in Syria
30 March 2012
Turkey and the US in no one's world
28 March 2012
Turkey as a global swing state?
23 March 2012
Nothing new on the eastern front
21 March 2012
Our security and NATO
16 March 2012
America
14 March 2012
Letter from Sea Island, Georgia
7 March 2012
Syria’s barbarians must be stopped
7 March 2012
Syria's barbarians must be stopped
2 March 2012
The neighborhood: policies, priorities and power
29 February 2012
The Armenian file
24 February 2012
The Syrian struggle and Tunis
22 February 2012
Trauma, renewal and the demand for more change
17 February 2012
What to read?
15 February 2012
Winter of uncertainties
10 February 2012
Turkey's media
8 February 2012
Munich, Moscow, Damascus
2 February 2012
Beyond the stage
27 January 2012
Where is the Polish ambassador?
25 January 2012
Letter from Garmisch
20 January 2012
Winter of discontent
18 January 2012
Disgrace
13 January 2012
Why we need to act on Syria
11 January 2012
It is time for Turkish leadership on Syria
4 January 2012
A strategy for 2012
1 January 2012
A column without a heading
28 December 2011
A wish list for 2012
23 December 2011
What else is new in Russia?
21 December 2011
1915 is back
14 December 2011
The rise of democracy
9 December 2011
Match-rigging, football and politics
7 December 2011
Changing perceptions in the Middle East
2 December 2011
Turkey needs a normal opposition
30 November 2011
Russia's losing battles
25 November 2011
The Arab Awakening: an attempt at stocktaking
23 November 2011
Responsibility to protect
18 November 2011
What to do with Syria
16 November 2011
Grace
11 November 2011
The republic
9 November 2011
Ankara will need to tread with care
4 November 2011
İstanbul Forum
...
Bloggers