Religion in the name of what?
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 June 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 03 September 2012, Monday 6 0 0 0
ALİ BULAÇ
a.bulac@todayszaman.com

Religion in the name of what?

As a rule of thumb, no one is entitled to speak directly on behalf of or in the name of Islam and Muslims. In Islam, no one speaks on behalf of God or the religion. Unless s/he is elected by Muslims or a legitimate authority as a spokesperson, everyone may only speak on his or her own and in their capacity as an ordinary Muslim.

As a minimum, every single Muslim is responsible for conveying the message of Islam to those who have not yet received this message (tabligh) and, in the same context, it is obligatory for every Muslim to enjoin and promote what is right and good and prevent evil (amr bi al-ma’ruf wa nahy ‘an al-munkar). This mission of conveying the message of Islam cannot be monopolized by any official authority or by a privileged community. Likewise, amr bi al-ma’ruf wa nahy ‘an al-munkar is a duty on civilians. Everyone tries to perform this duty according to his or her capacity and resources.

Similarly, no one can be deprived of the right or freedom of speaking in his or her own name, on behalf of any Muslim identity s/he has declared to have adopted and also opposing or criticizing other views. The general principle, as it is noted in the 18th verse of Surah al-Zumar, is: “Who, when they hear speech, follow the best of it (in the best way possible, and even seek what is better and straighter).” For the “best of speech” to emerge, we need an environment where all speech can be freely uttered.

In this connection, a Muslim is not entitled to strike a deal with other people on behalf of Muslims -- unless s/he is assigned by Muslims to that capacity. The sole prerequisite for representation is that anyone who is capable of representing Muslims in a proficient manner should be elected through free elections.

Unfortunately, these Islamic principles are not properly implemented and the people who see themselves as capable of speaking on behalf of Islam are doing great harm to Islam, however well-meaning they are. Most of the time, people tend to use Islam as a disguise for their personal disposition or character. Usually, they do this unawares. For instance, a person may be harsh in character, tend to adopt pessimistic views on developments or is not capable of coexisting with other people peacefully or tolerating their errors or flaws, but s/he may repurpose these personal characteristics as though they are religious injunctions. Naturally, in the discourse and rhetoric of such a person, religion is portrayed as a harsh, intolerant system that is not open to dialogue, interactive relations or cooperation.

The political views of the Young Turks and the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), as well as the Kuva-yi Milliye (National Forces) movement which played a major role in the establishment of the Turkish Republic, have influenced Muslims as well. Some Islamists draw on this tradition of using political power as a tool for purging and destruction. Here, we must make clear who is really thinking on behalf of Islam and the Muslim community. We must be aware of this fact as we are assessing the individuals and communities that develop political attitudes on behalf of Muslims. People may conceal their nationalist views with the help of an Islamic rhetoric; they may purport nationalist or sectarian ideas without even being aware of them; they may even translate historic contentions into today’s language.

But if you are a little perceptive, you can discern nationalist or sectarian views or traces of historic hostilities beneath the surface of what they say. They do not advocate these racist, nationalist or sectarian ideas consciously and they even regard any suggestion to this effect as an accusation and deny it with strong language. But as “Islamist Kemalists,” they champion the nation-state’s organization model, Kemalism’s authoritarian and repressive parameters and attempt to justify them with references to Islam. Therefore, they fulminate against secular Kemalists or leftists who do not see Islam as a founding or motivating element of a nation-state. In their universe, the secularists and atheists who do not join in this “Islamic nation-state project” are insisting on their errors on purpose.

Yet, if we, as Muslims, have certain obligations to Islam, they are related only to earning God’s consent and promoting Islam in the same manner as we are openly notified in the following verses: “Say: ‘I am commanded to worship God, sincere in faith in Him and practicing the Religion purely for His sake’,” and “[As for those of you who reject my call,] worship then whatever you will apart from Him [you are forewarned of the consequences]!” (Surah al-Zumar, 39:11 and 15). A religion which is experienced with sincerity (ikhlas) will bring peace, tranquility and security, not only to its practitioners but also to all of humanity. Indeed, the Prophet of this religion was sent as a mercy to all the worlds.

COMMENTS
Let's not try to give Islam a clean image. I would like to ask the question; Can Islam and Democracy co-exist for the sake of people of Middle East. If you try to prove above that by nature Islam is democratic why on earth Islamic countries do not govern themselves as one?
SERAP EMOND
It is exausthing trying to give Islam a clean image. Islam is a religeon highly politicized at this preiod of the HISTORY. What needs to be dissuced is how to wipe these religously charged totalitarian regimes from the face of the earth through democratic principals not versus from Kuran.
Serap Emond
"Anyone who is capable of representing Muslims in a proficient manner should be elected through free elections." Where in the Muslim world do you have free (and fair ...) elections?? In Syria? Iran? Saudi Arabia? Yemen? Libya? Mali? Somalia? Sudan? Morocco? And how was the head of the OIC e.g. chos...
meryem
Religion per ce is not suitable for political management .Because it is open for Mufeser ( interperator) for tefsir, also for Ta weel ( originations ) and for Mujtahad ( scholler to give it up to date interpertation ) Thart mean ten opinion for every issue. Shiaisim try to settle that...
Esfandyar
"Some Islamists draw on this tradition of using political power as a tool for purging and destruction. Here, we must make clear who is really thinking on behalf of Islam and the Muslim community." As a non-Muslim, the issues within Islam are of no relevance to me. They have to be worked out within ...
Jack Kalpakian
i 100%agree with ur opinion,we need this attitude as u pointed out because some elements tarnish the image of islam bcos lack of knowledge about basic of islam,so continue u writing on these issues Amanullah Noon.Pakistan
amanullah noon
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
10 June 2013
The real problem is deep down
3 June 2013
A new approach
27 May 2013
Does secularization modernize societies? (2)
21 May 2013
Does secularization modernize societies? (1)
13 May 2013
If the world is not possible, then man isn't either!
6 May 2013
Testing liberal theory in practice
29 April 2013
Moral marginals
22 April 2013
Demanding rights!
15 April 2013
Authentic pluralism
8 April 2013
Higher reference
1 April 2013
Is democracy a sword of Damocles?
25 March 2013
Ways of cancelling the will of the majority
18 March 2013
Liberal contradiction
11 March 2013
What does democracy offer religion?
4 March 2013
Changing criteria for Muslims
25 February 2013
Who is testing whom?
18 February 2013
The democracy test
11 February 2013
A comparison between mosques and churches (2)
4 February 2013
A comparison between mosques and churches (1)
28 January 2013
Is non-Western modernization possible?
21 January 2013
Modernization, Westernization and secularism (1)
14 January 2013
Can religion be separated from life?
7 January 2013
Burning in fire of dissension sparked by unprincipled people
31 December 2012
Escape from chaos
24 December 2012
Lumpenization of bedouins
17 December 2012
Turkey’s Islam
10 December 2012
Reasons not to trust the EU
3 December 2012
Genius and taqwa
26 November 2012
What is ‘national’?
19 November 2012
UN must be restructured
12 November 2012
The world in the new era
5 November 2012
What about hunger strikes?
29 October 2012
What are we sacrificing?
22 October 2012
Turkish model
15 October 2012
Three models of Islam
8 October 2012
New political culture
1 October 2012
The way we perceive problems (2)
24 September 2012
The way we perceive problems (1)
17 September 2012
Global conspiracy
10 September 2012
A way out
3 September 2012
Religion in the name of what?
27 August 2012
Europe’s conscience
13 August 2012
Prayer
6 August 2012
Culture
30 July 2012
Society
23 July 2012
Tragedy of intellectuals
16 July 2012
Soroush’s fallacy
9 July 2012
Return to reason
2 July 2012
Once there was a Garaudy
25 June 2012
Founding actors of the region
18 June 2012
Some day, the West will realize
11 June 2012
Change of political name
4 June 2012
Search for a new model
28 May 2012
Islam is like a river
21 May 2012
What are the media? What do they do?
14 May 2012
Does anybody really know?
7 May 2012
On the army
30 April 2012
The political destiny of the Middle East
23 April 2012
The Middle East: tribe, spoils and faith
19 April 2012
Reading change (2)
16 April 2012
Reading change (1)
9 April 2012
Pluralism within Islam
5 April 2012
A single standard
2 April 2012
Religion and politics in Turkey (2)
29 March 2012
Religion and politics in Turkey (1)
26 March 2012
A new authority
26 March 2012
A new authority
22 March 2012
Philosophy of reforms (2)
19 March 2012
Philosophy of reforms (1)
15 March 2012
Handling the modernity crisis
12 March 2012
Democratization of education
8 March 2012
What is wisdom and purpose?
5 March 2012
Finding what we have lost
1 March 2012
Those who migrate, those who force others to migrate
27 February 2012
A challenging solution for Syria
24 February 2012
From Alparslan to Salahuddin!
16 February 2012
How does Iran get stronger?
13 February 2012
The state on target: Iran
9 February 2012
Sunni-Shiite-secular
6 February 2012
Wars of religion
2 February 2012
Sectarian wars
30 January 2012
The ‘other’ and our need to be ‘threatened’
26 January 2012
Salvation, not welfare
23 January 2012
Modern meaning of history
19 January 2012
Rational basis of religious violence
16 January 2012
Righteous reason and a pure disposition
12 January 2012
Enlightenment, Islam and intellect
9 January 2012
Controversy within Europe
5 January 2012
Could Christianity transform?
2 January 2012
Return to Christianity
29 December 2011
Reminding Europe of its identity
26 December 2011
Social gender
22 December 2011
NATO and Afghanistan
15 December 2011
Cause of the problem
12 December 2011
Two steps forward, one step back
8 December 2011
Thought crime
5 December 2011
Point of reference for our rights and freedoms
1 December 2011
Mistakes in Syria
28 November 2011
Concerns over Syria
24 November 2011
The single article of the Constitution
...
Bloggers