What is YAŞ?
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
25 May 2013 Saturday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 06 August 2012, Monday 0 0 0 0
LALE KEMAL
loglu@todayszaman.com

What is YAŞ?

The Supreme Military Council (YAŞ) is one of the important tools for the military to continue its privileged status and lack of accountability. It has 13 members composed of senior generals, including the chief of general staff and four service commanders as well as two civilian members i.e. the prime minister and the minister of defense. This asymmetrical membership composition of YAŞ alone does not necessitate making much comment over how this institution functions as a tool for the military to exert its influence over politics.

The YAŞ meets twice a year, in August and in December, under the chairmanship of the prime minister whose presence used to be symbolic until 2010 when the political authority began exerting its legal power, to a certain extent, over the YAŞ's decisions on the promotions and retirements of generals. During the August meetings, the YAŞ decides over the promotions and retirements of generals and service commanders as well as promotion of colonels to the rank of generals. In December, the council takes a decision about the 10-year-long arms procurement plans that are revised every two years. In both meetings, the YAŞ also elaborates on the general security situation in Turkey and its environs.

Why does the YAŞ, staffed by generals, take decisions on issues such as the promotions of generals, including service commanders and the chief of general staff, as well as on arms procurement matters which should all fall under the responsibility of both the government and Parliament? There is a simple answer to that question, which is that the military has not yet come under full civilian control.

It is not only the YAŞ's membership composition -- which is overwhelmingly represented by senior uniformed men -- but its status as well which is problematic. Retired military judge and a former politician Faik Tarımcıoğlu recalls that the YAŞ was established in 1971 soon after the military issued a memorandum that led to the resignation of the government at the time. Exploiting its then political power, the military junta within the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) which issued the 1971 memorandum, imposed on Parliament a law that allowed the creation of the YAŞ. The law was designed in a way that that has prevented the elected authorities from intervening in its decisions over the promotions and retirements of generals and admirals, as well as the chief of general staff and service commanders in addition to its decisions on buying arms.

It was only in 2010 that the prime minister and chairman of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party), Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, as well as President Abdullah Gül both began using their legal powers to interfere in the YAŞ's decisions. This has, however, sparked a strong resistance from the politically meddlesome military.

The 2010 and 2011 August meetings of the council also coincided with the promotions and retirement decisions on the generals who were among the 404 retired and active officers from various ranks jailed over charges of plotting to overthrow the government. In both the YAŞ meetings, the political authority could not break, to a large extent, the military's resistance against retiring all the active generals and admirals in jail, despite the fact that Article 65 of the TSK Personnel Law allows this decision to be made.

But at this year's YAŞ meeting which ended on August 3, a day earlier than planned and which took place without any crisis contrary to earlier meetings, 40 generals and admirals who were in jail over coup charges but were awaiting promotions this year were retired, even though there are approximately 60 active generals and admirals, including those 40 officers, from various ranks who are currently in jail.

Tarımcıoğlu is of the opinion that the government made “a little concession instead of a big one,” at this year's YAŞ meeting by not retiring all the approximately 60 active generals and admirals. Still, he says, the retirement of 40 generals and admirals out of 60 via the influence of civilian authority as well as President Gül -- all civilian political authorities -- can be described as a purge of a coup mentality from within the TSK which staged two military coups and a postmodern coup while issuing two memorandums against the previous and the current governments between 1960 and 2007.

Political authority has succeeded, to a large extent, in cleaning from within the TSK those brought up by an education that the TSK can stage coups when it deems it necessary in accordance with its self-designed threat perceptions by retiring the 40 arrested generals and admirals awaiting promotions. It has also influenced generals at the YAŞ by promoting the more liberal thinking generals to higher ranks assumed to be respectful of civilian governance. However, the YAŞ remains one of the important tools for the military to continue its privileged status which require changes in laws to end its political power.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
22 May 2013
Reyhanlı attack & rethinking Turkish democracy
20 May 2013
Syrian crisis carries risk of killing Erdoğan's political calculations
15 May 2013
Will the Syrian tragedy be Turkey's, too?
13 May 2013
Who will benefit from shortened military service?
8 May 2013
What will be the next move?
6 May 2013
Turkey's mishandling of the JSF
1 May 2013
Bureaucratic war over democratic oversight
29 April 2013
Presidential system and authoritarianism
24 April 2013
Erdoğan will obtain presidential powers
22 April 2013
Peace process and reduction of military power
17 April 2013
Turkish-Israeli military ties will not resume soon
15 April 2013
Al-Nusra's growing influence prompts frequent Turkey visits by Kerry
10 April 2013
Military-government covert deal doomed to fail
8 April 2013
National strategy lacking in Turkish peace process
3 April 2013
Why this stubbornness to kill transparency?
1 April 2013
Government push for unrealistic demands risks peace process
27 March 2013
Military response to solution process is an open question
25 March 2013
Turkish-Israeli reconciliation to help thwart regional threats
20 March 2013
PKK disarmament will come later
18 March 2013
Shortcomings in judicial reform to slow peace process
13 March 2013
Favoritism poisons ethical values in Turkey
11 March 2013
Peace process and presidential system
6 March 2013
PKK's European wing weighs in on peace process
4 March 2013
Where does the military stand in the peace process?
27 February 2013
Achieving peace also requires open debate on state mistakes
25 February 2013
Uludere and making peace
20 February 2013
Decentralization is critical in Kurdish peace process
18 February 2013
Alternative to current peace process is catastrophe
13 February 2013
Turkish military's morale from a historic perspective (2)
11 February 2013
Turkish military's morale from a historic perspective (1)
6 February 2013
Is Turkey seeking to revive pan-Turkism?
4 February 2013
Turkish-US conflicts are at tactical level
30 January 2013
Society necessitates the emergence of a new democratic movement
28 January 2013
In a radical move, Turkey opts for co-development of long-range missiles
23 January 2013
US delivers democracy message to Turkey
21 January 2013
Kurdish issue haunts CHP
15 January 2013
What will happen if China suffers from famine?
9 January 2013
'I can make everything' policy will weaken defense industry
7 January 2013
Yet another process to beat terror
2 January 2013
Getting rid of a state of siege mood
31 December 2012
Beginning new year with good news for transparency
28 December 2012
Invitation crisis implicates PM
26 December 2012
Grave violation of soldier rights
24 December 2012
Turkey's unclear direction raises concerns
20 December 2012
Russia should cooperate if it wants to protect post-Assad interests in Syria
17 December 2012
Why was Taraf important?
13 December 2012
Why has the Turkish commander received a medal?
10 December 2012
Why didn't Russia ask for the return of seized military equipment from Turkey?
5 December 2012
Immunity debate demonstrates Turkey's Kurdish deadlock
3 December 2012
Scrutiny over defense industry activities
26 November 2012
Turkish nationalism prone to exploitation
21 November 2012
Turkish Parliament surprised me
19 November 2012
End of hunger strikes may revive peace talks
14 November 2012
Is Turkey seeking a 19th-century constitutional monarchy?
12 November 2012
In Turkey causes of incidents are left in the dark
7 November 2012
Göktürk satellite project recalls reform in defense industry
5 November 2012
Hunger strike opens a new page in Kurdish question
1 November 2012
Curiosity surrounds Babacan's replacement
29 October 2012
Turkey's security-centric approach and its repercussions
24 October 2012
Turkey's choice: modernity over democracy
22 October 2012
Erdoğan is hedging his bets
17 October 2012
Turkey should not criticize, it is doing poorly
15 October 2012
Turkey should make efforts to diffuse tension with Syria
11 October 2012
Transparency will beat corruption
9 October 2012
Civilian protection and state transparency
3 October 2012
Nations run out of ideas on Syria as FSA runs out of ammunition
1 October 2012
Another Oslo cannot come out from this speech
26 September 2012
New party scenarios are discussed in Ankara
24 September 2012
Future coups or coup plans will freeze Turkey's NATO membership
19 September 2012
War to gain psychological superiority
17 September 2012
Dealing with arms in post-Assad period
12 September 2012
One step forward, two steps back
10 September 2012
Transparency and accountability are key for democracy
29 August 2012
Alarm bells do not ring despite danger on its way
27 August 2012
Returning to normalcy
22 August 2012
A nation that can't finish the war
15 August 2012
Why media becomes vulnerable
13 August 2012
Turkey's gamble on Syria
8 August 2012
Rethinking Kurdish question as Burkay talks
6 August 2012
What is YAŞ?
1 August 2012
Between paranoia and reality
30 July 2012
Indifference to police misconduct
26 July 2012
Critical questions not asked in F-4 downing
23 July 2012
Turkey’s difficult times as Syrian conflict intensifies
18 July 2012
Is the CHP the same old story, same old song?
16 July 2012
Turkey played all cards in Syrian conflict
11 July 2012
Transparency will shed light on jet downing
9 July 2012
Helping Kurds explore avenues other than guns
4 July 2012
Turkish media deceives public over strength of locally developed arms
2 July 2012
Government is taken hostage by Huntington’s theory
20 June 2012
Gül to return to politics on his own terms
18 June 2012
Turkey should beat fear to thwart extreme Kurdish demands
13 June 2012
AK Party faces risk of losing popular support
11 June 2012
Restrictions on human rights poison positive Turkish climate
6 June 2012
‘New CHP’ undergoes critical test on Kurdish issue
4 June 2012
Why is Turkey in reform fatigue?
30 May 2012
I liked the AK Party because it was reformist
28 May 2012
Turkey presses for arms but not a Kurdish solution
23 May 2012
Who is in the driver’s seat in Turkey?
21 May 2012
Carelessness in target selection results in killing of 34 civilians
...