Kılıçdaroğlu under the shadow of the CHP
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 29 July 2012, Sunday 1 0 0 0
ORHAN OĞUZ GÜRBÜZ
o.gurbuz@todayszaman.com

Kılıçdaroğlu under the shadow of the CHP

Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu was re-elected as chairman of the People’s Republican Party (CHP) in the last party convention and is trying to introduce the concept of the “New CHP.”

In an interview where he said, “Alevism is a part of Islam; it is not a separate religion,” he also noted that they are now promoting freedoms rather than the status quo (Bugün, July 23).

Kılıçdaroğlu also called on the government to abolish the “coup law,” the military court of appeals and the supreme military administrative court.

Even though he acted reluctantly and hesitantly on the subordination of the General Staff to the Ministry of Defense, arguing that this is a controversial issue, Kılıçdaroğlu’s statements could be interpreted as promises that all democrats would endorse.

Kılıçdaroğlu is slowly repressing the culture of intra-party opposition that emerged as a symbol of dynamism. For example, to those who said they admire former CHP leader Deniz Baykal and former Secretary-General Önder Sav for their skills in managing the party’s branches, he said, “There you go, take Adnan Keskin.” Keskin was elected to head the İstanbul branch of the CHP, which is the most important branch. It could be said that he now acquired greater legitimacy and strength thanks to the latest party congress.

As noted by Kılıçdaroğlu, the perception that the CHP is unable to offer projects remains a huge problem. In addition, the argument that people from different political backgrounds will join the party and that this will promote its image did not happen. The CHP cannot resolve the issue that it is perceived as a party that does not offer any concrete project by admitting right-wing politicians.

A party that is unable to get rid of the spirit of pro-guardianship Kemalism and serves as a tool of the status quo cannot come to power. The CHP may become successful only if it restructures itself as a social democrat party relying on universal standards and pays attention to projects rather than slogans. Every political actor in a position of leadership may want to become independent from the powers and groups that support it or that “manufactured its agenda” in the first place.

Kılıçdaroğlu was reminded of an approaching danger suggesting that the Kurdish and Alevi supporters are about to change their minds, and he may now want to set his own game within the party because he is now a strong political leader and figure. But this is not that easy.

“With a new CHP,” Kılıçdaroğlu said, “we do not mean a party detached from its roots. Its history and past includes Adnan Menderes, Celal Bayar, Refik Koraltan and Hasan Ali Yücel as well as leading figures of the national liberation war.” However, most of these names joined other parties because they felt they no longer had any chance of advancing their political careers within the CHP. Whether this chance will be there in the new CHP remains to be seen.

We have witnessed that Muhammet Çakmak was strongly vetoed by the delegates because of his religiosity, despite attempts to appeal to people from different social segments. It is not possible to believe that this party will abolish the military judiciary just because one of its deputies, Ergenekon suspect İlhan Cihaner, said “I am a socialist” in response to a question suggesting that he was accused of being part of the deep state. Is it meaningful if a party used by Ergenekon suspects as a safe haven to avoid prosecution says it is not defending the status quo?

In the same interview, Kılıçdaroğlu also draws attention to the importance of local administrations. I think this is one of the best options that the CHP could rely on. The most influential factor that took the AK Party to power was the strong performance of the Welfare Party (RP) in local administrations. The people took this as a point of reference. The CHP may appeal to the people by realistic, consistent and comprehensive local administration strategies and projects.

If Kılıçdaroğlu offers an apology for the repressive actions and behavior by the leading names of the CHP tradition, which he refers to as their tradition, his party could then be called the new CHP. If it seems utopic to give up on the six arrows, at least an arrow of democracy could be added. The CHP will never become civilian unless it rejects its past. We all love the Yogi Bear that will be distributed to the voters. However, unless he acts like Lucky Luke, who draws his gun very fast, the CHP’s historical ghost will haunt Kılıçdaroğlu despite all his efforts.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
15 June 2013
Turkish Olympiads and achieving peace
9 June 2013
Taksim protests and dromology
2 June 2013
Coups and capitalists
26 May 2013
Guardianship in the corridors of Ankara
19 May 2013
First, there was justice
12 May 2013
Democratic checks and human rights
5 May 2013
Piri Reis and ayran nationalism
28 April 2013
Domestic, socialist, Ottoman: Kemal Tahir
21 April 2013
Özal’s legacy
14 April 2013
The enemy in the mirror
7 April 2013
Islamic scholars and peace
31 March 2013
March 31 incident and Abdülhamid II
24 March 2013
Exit from Ergenekon: a constitution
17 March 2013
Hostage to politics
10 March 2013
City, identity and migration
3 March 2013
Feb. 28 spirit and feeling sorry for your hitman
24 February 2013
There are judges in Silivri
17 February 2013
The dangers of a wounded guardian authority
10 February 2013
Education and culture in the 2023 vision
3 February 2013
Does democracy have a backup?
27 January 2013
Demirel, counter-guerilla and US
20 January 2013
Parties without politics
13 January 2013
From the Unionists’ 1913 Babıali raid to now
6 January 2013
Is a new constitution possible in the new year?
30 December 2012
‘Waiting for suitable conditions’
23 December 2012
Democratic media and the Taraf daily
16 December 2012
Populist nationalism and militarism
9 December 2012
Conservatism and the defeat of pleasure
25 November 2012
How will Sept. 12 trial end?
18 November 2012
Politics in a tight space
4 November 2012
‘Republican regime not destroyed by walks and marches’
21 October 2012
Do we throw away EU membership or democracy?
14 October 2012
Who learned their Feb. 28 lesson?
7 October 2012
The age of Eric Hobsbawm
30 September 2012
Balyoz is over; is guardianship?
23 September 2012
The Menderes legacy: lessons on ‘guardian mentality’
16 September 2012
Xenophobia and the Zirve case
9 September 2012
Did Breivik deserve Europe?
2 September 2012
What does the ‘National Agreement’ move target?
26 August 2012
Did the European Union project collapse?
19 August 2012
Only a civilian constitution can foil this scheme
12 August 2012
Islamism and cultural void
5 August 2012
Is AK Party creditor and Gül debtor?
29 July 2012
Kılıçdaroğlu under the shadow of the CHP
22 July 2012
AK Görüş
15 July 2012
Guardian authority and fish
...
Bloggers