AKP and the absence of truth
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 01 July 2012, Sunday 5 0 0 0
EMRE USLU
e.uslu@todayszaman.com

AKP and the absence of truth

The major contribution the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has made to Turkish politics is to bring the “truth” into politics.

In fact, the AKP earned its reputation by telling the truth about what the party intends to do.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's reputation is particularly related with this perception. He was considered the leader that never lies. Thus, when the opposition parties argued that the AKP had a “hidden agenda” for the secular regime, people did not buy this argument. This is because Erdoğan's reputation as a leader that tells the truth prevented people from believing what the opposition parties were saying about him.

However, in recent months people discovered the other face of the AKP. Surprisingly, the party leaders, including Erdoğan, have been telling lie after lie to their own people. Worst, many of the AKP figures try to explain this hypocritical side of the AKP as the “nature of politics.”

The following is a list of the AKP's lies in the last year which have had a major impact on Turkish politics.

1) Before the June 2011 elections Erdoğan said, “If I were in power in 1999, I would have executed [Abdullah] Öcalan's death sentence.” It turned out that in the same week that Erdoğan said this, the National Intelligence Organization (MİT) was, with his permission, negotiating with Öcalan.

2) The AKP did not tell the whole truth about the Uludere incident, in which 34 innocent villagers were bombed by Turkish war jets, to the people, prosecutor and Parliament.

3) AKP leaders, including Erdoğan, recently said that the criminal courts that handled the Ergenekon, Balyoz (Sledgehammer) and Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK) trials will remain and the law will not change to alter these courts. But as of Saturday it turned out this promise was a lie, too.

4) On the jet crisis, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu said and Erdoğan confirmed that the Turkish jet was shot down in international waters, but The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that this statement was not correct. The jet was downed in Syrian airspace and Turkish sources did not deny the WSJ article.

One can add many lies to this list but these are the four major lies that dominated Turkish politics over the past year. These are the issues that harmed Erdoğan's reputation as a man of truth. These are the issues that placed Erdoğan right next to old politicians, especially next to former President Süleyman Demirel, who was well known for his inconsistent statements and his motto “Yesterday is yesterday, today is today,” meaning whatever I said yesterday belongs to yesterday and I am not responsible for what I said yesterday.

When I bring up the issue, many AKP leaders “explain” that this is the nature of politics. However, it was Erdoğan's contribution to Turkish politics that politicians do not flip-flop but say things as they are. Such attitudes of the AKP leaders indicate that Erdoğan and the AKP have yet again adopted the same old political tactics to save the day instead of looking at the future.

There can be a number of reasons why the AKP leaders have rediscovered the old habit of Turkish politics, lying, after 10 years. One of the main reasons they've started to lie when faced with difficulties is because there is no alternative to the AKP. Thus, they think they are immortal and immune to political criticism. More importantly, they think they can manipulate people for a long time. When they lie to the people they count on Erdoğan's leadership skills, which still appeal to many.

I consider this a major problem for the AKP government for the years to come. As they continue lying to the people, they will realize that people will no longer believe these lies. Lying in politics is one of the worst addictions, which politicians cannot escape from. Thus, unless the AKP has a medical treatment that can help it refrain from lying, one can count down the days until the end of the AKP.

COMMENTS
if he was soo misleading, the people of turkey wouldn't have selected hm as prime minister to run the country on 3 consecutive occasions, with record poll results.
yavuz
Mr. Uslu your arguments are very vague I think you should do more research before writing as you did before. I think some people made you angry and you lost your control of emotions, this is not good for a bright journalist. just a comment, smugglers are not innocent people but you can call them sec...
David
I think the article 4 in your list makes you a liar. Just have a look at the headlines.
hdemir
1.) His statement was qualified with IF, now since he was not in power in 2002, that condition has not been fulfilled thus his subsequent actions are irrelevant. 2.) You say the AKP didn't tell the whole truth about the Uludere incident, but you don't explain why. 3.) Although the law has been a...
Burak
You'll probably be sued by Erdogan for implying he's a liar. That's who he handles criticism from journalists.
Yaacov
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
16 June 2013
Is Erdoğan a dictator?
14 June 2013
Erdoğan's world: fear and fantasy
12 June 2013
MİT in breach of law
7 June 2013
How Erdoğan sees the protests in Turkey
5 June 2013
The one-man show has ended
2 June 2013
Understanding people's anger at Tayyip Erdoğan
31 May 2013
How MİT manipulated the media: the case of Reyhanlı
29 May 2013
Turkish media and MİT
26 May 2013
Intelligence wars
24 May 2013
Do Kurdish-Turkish marriages prevent division?
22 May 2013
Syrian crisis, Ankara crisis
19 May 2013
What did Erdoğan gain from Washington?
17 May 2013
Can we Turkify Turkish intelligence?
15 May 2013
Security weakness
10 May 2013
Why is the CHP so important for the AKP?
8 May 2013
Time for urban battle in Kurdish cities
5 May 2013
Is the MHP on the rise?
3 May 2013
Will Turkey agree to international intervention in Syria?
1 May 2013
The coming election period and the settlement process
26 April 2013
What did Karayılan ask?
24 April 2013
The PKK's new strategy: acts of civil disobedience
21 April 2013
Kurdish nationalism on the rise
19 April 2013
Freedom of Press in Turkey
17 April 2013
Skeptics and optimists
12 April 2013
Hizbullah-PKK clashes
10 April 2013
Plan B for peace
7 April 2013
Questions for wise men committee
5 April 2013
The role of the wise-man committee
3 April 2013
New moves in the solution process
31 March 2013
Finding solutions (2)
29 March 2013
Finding solutions
24 March 2013
How is peace with the PKK being made?
22 March 2013
What is in Öcalan's message
20 March 2013
Ergenekon's bomb message
17 March 2013
Something fishy going on?
15 March 2013
The Turkish flag at Nevruz celebrations?
13 March 2013
Let PKK hostages be ambassadors for peace
10 March 2013
Who will lose?
8 March 2013
Why is Erdoğan so furious?
6 March 2013
Why were the İmralı minutes leaked?
3 March 2013
Abdullah Öcalan: ‘a man of peace'
1 March 2013
MİT targets us
27 February 2013
Erdoğan and Öcalan took the right steps, but...
24 February 2013
What to make of the visit to Öcalan?
22 February 2013
What is happening in the CHP?
20 February 2013
The BDP's Black Sea trip and the violent protests
17 February 2013
Would the PKK suicide attack again?
15 February 2013
Erdoğan's new friends: generals
13 February 2013
Where is the solution process heading?
10 February 2013
Erdoğan's new enemy: the EU
6 February 2013
An open letter to the American ambassador to Turkey
3 February 2013
Causes behind DHKP/C shock among diplomats
1 February 2013
Paris killings' impact on negotiation process
30 January 2013
Ömer Güney was a courier
27 January 2013
Erdoğan considering Shanghai Five
25 January 2013
Is the PKK exhausted?
23 January 2013
Forecasting politics in 2013
20 January 2013
Abdullah Öcalan benefits from peace process
18 January 2013
Discussing the peace process
16 January 2013
Would the PKK agree with the government?
13 January 2013
Killing in Paris
9 January 2013
Sledgehammer verdicts: Professor Rodrik 'deserves' Nobel Prize
6 January 2013
PKK perspective on laying down arms
2 January 2013
Can the PKK lay down its arms?
30 December 2012
Yet again Öcalan-MİT meeting
28 December 2012
Disgusting
23 December 2012
The Patriot missiles and politics
21 December 2012
Bülent Arınç and the Kurdish portfolio
19 December 2012
Kurdish politics without Talabani
16 December 2012
Taraf, democracy and freedom of the press
14 December 2012
Washington, Syria and al-Qaeda
12 December 2012
Give that medal to Öcalan and the Oslo trumpeters!
7 December 2012
A Kurdish faction within the AKP?
5 December 2012
Bring EU process back to Turkish politics
2 December 2012
Putin's visit: What to do with him?
25 November 2012
The return of Erdoğan?
23 November 2012
Kenan Evren's confession and the Sledgehammer coup
21 November 2012
Hunger strike act: the return of Abdullah Öcalan
18 November 2012
Is Turkish-Kurdish peace on the horizon?
16 November 2012
Déjà vu
14 November 2012
Erdoğan’s way
11 November 2012
Was the chopper crash in Siirt an accident or a conspiracy?
9 November 2012
How does Öcalan think? What does he want?
7 November 2012
Obama: a Thanksgiving gift to the world
4 November 2012
PKK is winning
2 November 2012
Who recorded the Oslo meetings?
31 October 2012
Is Öcalan the right actor to solve the Kurdish problem?
28 October 2012
The Öcalan theater
24 October 2012
A storm looming after Eid
21 October 2012
Erdoğan's grave mistake
17 October 2012
The state was on the verge of shelling its own people
14 October 2012
Erdoğan's fear
10 October 2012
Political implications of Diyarbakır police chief’s statements
8 October 2012
AKP’s election strategy: 50 percent threshold
5 October 2012
What is wrong with our Syrian policy?
30 September 2012
10 years in power: the AKP as ‘perception changer'
28 September 2012
‘Peace' season has arrived once more
26 September 2012
The untold tragedies of PKK parents
23 September 2012
After the Sledgehammer trial: the defendants' strategy
20 September 2012
Where is Turkey heading?
...
Bloggers