The game against Hizmet
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 May 2013 Monday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 16 May 2012, Wednesday 7 0 0 0
İHSAN YILMAZ
ihsan.yilmaz@todayszaman.com

The game against Hizmet

“The game” in my headline refers to two separate things. The first one is football, which is indeed the game in today’s world, and the other is the game which is being played at the expense of the Hizmet movement. A campaign of psychological warfare has been launched against Hizmet, propagating that Hizmet is trying to bring down the Fenerbahçe Football Club without even a shred of evidence or any plausible explanation.

There is now a court case pending against a number of Fenerbahçe administrators, accusing them match rigging, etc. Some groups in Turkey have convinced a number of Fenerbahçe fans that Hizmet people within the judiciary and police are behind this plot and that they want to get rid of the current chairman of the club, Aziz Yıldırım, and take the club down. There are now not only many fanatical fans who believe this but also some renowned columnists who wrote about the issue openly in their columns and on Twitter. They cannot come up with any evidence or plausible explanations, but, based on a fear-mongering tactic of “they are everywhere,” are trying to create a certain perception.

In this regard, Hizmet people might be the “Jews” of Turkey and in the future these people might even be persecuted as a result of pure fabricated legends. We cannot know people’s intentions, but people in responsible positions must double-check their actions to see if and to what extent their declarations, statements, accusations, columns and tweets, knowingly or unknowingly, feed into this potentially monstrous and cruel public sentiment against Hizmet people, who are just ordinary individuals but accused of being sinister people, without any shred of evidence.

When it comes to Fenerbahçe, the very people who make accusations against the Hizmet movement keep saying the evidence against Fenerbahçe is weak. But when it comes to Hizmet, they imply that there is no need for evidence, as everyone knows about it. However, what does everyone know?

I do not think that this is just an issue regarding Fenerbahçe. Increasingly, every incident is being compared to the Hizmet movement by some quarters. When a number of mishaps took place in the university exams, some pointed fingers at Hizmet, without any evidence. Millions of people were confused about the matter. In state civil servant entry exams, similar things happened. While it was obvious that there are some gangs financially benefitting from these frauds, those groups were disregarded and the Hizmet movement was blamed instead. Funnily, some culprits who were caught red-handed even protested their innocence and blamed Hizmet instead.

I would be very much surprised if there is not a big brain behind this psychological war against the Hizmet movement, and if all these attacks are not coordinated. The Hizmet movement has been working towards democratization in Turkey, has been a staunch supporter of the European Union accession process and a champion of transparency in Turkey. Without its support on these issues, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government could not be successful and could not respond to Ergenekon.

Many privileged people, groups, individuals, institutions and so on are losing their undeserved privileges and they simply hate the Hizmet movement for its contribution. Now, there are even some liberal intellectuals who feel they are losing their privileged position of defending human rights and freedoms in Turkey and they resent the Hizmet movement as being ungrateful towards them or not exactly obeying their discourse, such as on the Kurdish issue. They simply want to be recorded in history as heroes and naively sympathize with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party’s (PKK) views, and are upset with the Hizmet movement for not following them blindly.

Thus, sometimes strange things happen and you could see an anti-Ergenekon liberal advocating a pro-Ergenekon view for purely selfish reasons.

COMMENTS
Johan: You have a point, but as a supporter of the Hizmet Movement I prefer Hizmet. Gulen movement make you think that one man, Mr Fethullah Gülen, is heading millions of people. It also make you think that this movement is a sect.
Osman F
Johan, everybody is not required to adjust everything for your tiny brain.
GeneralSherman
Rumors? "Hizmet people" accepted the "AnnanPlan" that would have destroyed an independent Turkish Cypriot Republic (KKTC) and reduced its citizens to a second-class status under Greek Cypriot rule, did they not? "Hizmet people" attack Turkey and insult Turks by labeling our state and military as "E...
Semra
Some people have gotten unearned income illegally for years in Turkey. Some of them were especially in the army. Those people in army sucked Turkish goverment finacially and phsychologically. Those people are also the members of the organisation called as Ergenekon. When you see the life they live, ...
Kuzey tekinoğlu
All of the people who are against Hizmet forget the important point Hizmet reaches out to almost 2/3 of the world, approximately in 140 states. So, I do not think so they have any time to spend for Fenerbahce or anything such futile.
eyup isa
These allegations are from an individual with an empty vessel. Does it even matter whether they support or oppose Hizmet? These people are focused with only serving their community and their fellowmen. The self-flagellating intellectuals who parade their utter ignorance of the Hizmet movement while ...
Torres,Sly|Manila Philippines
The word Hizmet is almost completely unknown among foreigners in Turkey. If you write in English, you want to reach out to groups who are not aware about these terminology as Hizmet, now I know it means Gulen. Know your readers!
Johan
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
Turkey, US and Russia on Syria
15 May 2013
Reyhanlı, the next 25 years and Alevis
10 May 2013
Politicians, privileges and Islamic law
8 May 2013
Politicians and corruption in Turkey
3 May 2013
Polarization
1 May 2013
Historic ijma meeting in İstanbul
26 April 2013
1915 (2)
24 April 2013
1915 (1)
19 April 2013
From Islamism to either post-Islamism or ‘lost Islamism'
17 April 2013
Erdoğan: both an asset and a liability for the new Turkey
12 April 2013
Disappointment in Turkish Islamists vis-à-vis press freedoms
10 April 2013
The Armenian issue of 1915, Turkish politics and Israel
3 April 2013
‘General Will,' Kemalists and neo-Kemalists
29 March 2013
Practicing Muslims and social (in)justice
27 March 2013
Wise men?
22 March 2013
Öcalan, PKK, AKP, Erdoğan
20 March 2013
From Hasan Cemal
15 March 2013
The İmralı peace process and defaming Hizmet
13 March 2013
Freedom of the press in Turkey
8 March 2013
Criticizing authoritarian tendencies and practices of today
6 March 2013
Apo TV
1 March 2013
Turkish nationalism and my Said Nursi
27 February 2013
I am not a nationalist
22 February 2013
Modern age slavery and practicing Muslims
20 February 2013
The new constitution and social-engineering the “best” citizen
15 February 2013
How my message was distorted by a Western ‘journalist'
13 February 2013
Practicing Muslims, human rights and global Hilf al-Fudul
8 February 2013
Caring for the 42 percent, the new constitution and Abant spirit
6 February 2013
Shanghai criteria, the EU and our Islamists
1 February 2013
Social (in)justice in Turkey
30 January 2013
Quality of academics and scholars in Turkey
25 January 2013
The Kurdish initiative, the AKP and losing the Kurds
18 January 2013
In memory of Mehmet Ali Birand
9 January 2013
Practicing Muslims and negotiating with the Kurdists
4 January 2013
Practicing Muslims' old and new problems with meritocracy
2 January 2013
Meritocracy and practicing Muslims
28 December 2012
Erdoğan and Ergenekon: two options
26 December 2012
Kemalo-Islamists
21 December 2012
Taxation, social justice, neo-liberalism, AKP and the Turkish Islamists
19 December 2012
Taraf and its enemies
14 December 2012
AKP and the Kurdish problem
12 December 2012
Turkish readings of Egyptian politics
7 December 2012
The AKP and the religious Kurds
5 December 2012
The ‘Patriots’ and the difficulty of being a Turkish Islamist
30 November 2012
The Palestinian state
28 November 2012
Discussing identity, multiculturalism and peace-building in Indonesia
23 November 2012
Israeli brutality and the democratic gap in the Middle East
21 November 2012
‘Sacred, Secular, Twin Tolerations and the Hizmet’
16 November 2012
Syria, Israel and Turkey’s predicaments in the Middle East
9 November 2012
Failure of post-Islamism and construction of official Islam
7 November 2012
Who is tarnishing Turkey’s image?
2 November 2012
AKP as both asset, liability to worldwide Muslim politics
31 October 2012
The miserable opposition
24 October 2012
Qurbani in the Islamophobic Turkish media
19 October 2012
Kurdish villagers, Erdoğan and Gül
17 October 2012
The difficulty of criticizing the AKP
12 October 2012
Crying for the terrorists
10 October 2012
Positive signs at the İstanbul Forum
5 October 2012
Syrian cul-de-sac and remembering Cyprus 1974
3 October 2012
2023 vision: excellent; 2013 vision: absent
28 September 2012
Understanding Balyoz officers: the military as a total institution
26 September 2012
Anti-Erdoğanism and 2014
21 September 2012
Difficulty of being critical
19 September 2012
Reforming the army?
14 September 2012
Criticizing Hizmet
12 September 2012
MİT, the army, the Foreign Ministry and I
7 September 2012
Is Davutoğlu the culprit?
5 September 2012
Erdoğan and the PKK, his Achilles’ heel
31 August 2012
AKP, Hizmet and politics
29 August 2012
Defeating the AKP in elections?
24 August 2012
Silent intellectuals and talking to the PKK?
22 August 2012
The PKK and speaking the unspeakable
17 August 2012
The PKK and the people’s wish
10 August 2012
A failed fairy tale of a poor imprisoned German-Turk
9 August 2012
Der Spiegel’s recent strange attack on the Hizmet Movement
8 August 2012
Turkish ‘discovery’ of Islamist Iran’s nationalism
3 August 2012
7 arrows of Kemalo-Islamism
1 August 2012
The AKP and the Alevi problem in Turkey
27 July 2012
Zero problems with (Kurdish) neighbors?
25 July 2012
Mor Gabriel Monastery and the new AKP
20 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (2)
18 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (1)
13 July 2012
AKP: No longer a democratizing force
11 July 2012
Domestic humanistic depth: missing dimension of Turkish foreign policy
6 July 2012
Turkish foreign policy: Quo vadis?
4 July 2012
Kurdish problem, PKK, AKP, Hizmet
29 June 2012
Syria and Turkish foreign policy
27 June 2012
Syria: winner take all?
22 June 2012
Abant Platform: perspectives on Turkey
20 June 2012
Hizmet and the Kurdish question
13 June 2012
‘Shallow-land’
8 June 2012
Kurdish issue, AKP and MHP
6 June 2012
Pluralism in Turkey and Islamism
1 June 2012
AKP: reverting back to Islamism?
30 May 2012
Revisiting the AKP
25 May 2012
The Egyptian elections, Islam and Islamists
23 May 2012
Who has infiltrated the Turkish state?
18 May 2012
Are there a few Hizmet(s)?
16 May 2012
The game against Hizmet
11 May 2012
Why do we need a presidential system?
...