Recent trends in Turkey
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 01 May 2012, Tuesday 0 0 0 0
DOĞU ERGİL
d.ergil@todayszaman.com

Recent trends in Turkey

A public opinion poll conducted in April by MetroPoll has revealed important trends. First of all, the percentage of citizens who believe both their personal standing and their country are on the right track is more than the dissatisfied. While 44 percent of the electorate believes Turkey is advancing positively, only 35 percent believe otherwise; 49 percent of the people believe their life is faring well. In general, 58 percent of the citizens of Turkey are pleased with their life.

Party preferences: 21 percent of the voters have switched the party they voted for in the last elections because its leader is not capable enough. Those who switched parties are highest for Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) and Republican People’s Party (CHP) voters; 28 percent and 20 percent, respectively.

If there were elections today, 71 percent of the voters said they would stick with their old party, while 17 percent would vote for other parties. Considering the number of the “undecided,” this ratio climbs up to roughly 25 percent; 12 percent of the voters have stated that they either did not like the party or its leader they voted for in the last elections or did not find it meaningful to vote. When this group is added on to the 20-25 percent of the voters who are ready to switch allegiance to a particular party, we may reach a rough estimate of voter alienation.

The CHP dilemma: Does the CHP represent the left and social democrats?

The CHP does not represent the left or the social democrats for 65 percent of all voters and 44 percent of CHP voters. In general, 55 percent of all voters do not believe that the CHP represents the traditional values and principles it used to defend. There is also a leadership problem in the CHP: 63 percent of all voters and 46 percent of CHP voters believe that this party suffers from a leadership deficit; 64 percent of all voters and 42 percent of CHP voters feel that the CHP needs a new leader, with 63 percent of all voters and 44 percent of CHP voters believing that the leadership problem had not been solved by the last CHP congress in late 2011.

Need for a new party: As the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government takes hold, the need for constructive and vibrant opposition for the sake of responsive government that is respectful of the rule of law gains more importance; the need for a new party seems to be surfacing among the electorate, with 54 percent of all voters and 42 percent of CHP voters indicating a new party should replace the CHP but possess its traditional values and principles. And what would those principles and values be? Those who advocate for a new party -- 29 percent -- hope this party will be more democratic than the present CHP, and 28 percent indicate it ought to be more respectful of the traditional values of the people (alluding to the elitist position of the old CHP); however, 17 percent think the new party should be more nationalist and Atatürkist. Only 4 percent of those who want a new party want it to be more leftist.

In addition, 58 percent of all respondents believe there is a vacuum when it comes to a functional opposition to the AK Party. It is important to note that the majority of opposition party supporters think along the same line: 64 percent of the CHP, 70 percent of the MHP and 77 percent of the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) complain about the lack of effective opposition (opposition void). Approximately 54 percent of all voters expressed the need for a strong opposition party to check the incumbent AK Party. These figures and trends attest to the democratic reflex of Turkish voters as well as the existing political reality of a skewed political system in favor of the AK Party government. People feel that the AK Party has become a hegemonic party and want to make sure that this is checked within the limits of a democratic opposition.

The Kurdish problem: A lingering problem that has not been solved yet through political means is the Kurdish issue. An important part of the process is to find the right party to negotiate a lasting solution. When asked which party should negotiate with the government, 34 percent of the respondents said the Kurdish people, while 9.3 percent pointed to the BDP and 3 percent to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). Those who have no opinion or did not want to answer were at 40 percent.

These findings attest to the fact that people are as confused or undecided as politicians when it comes to formulating a solution to this age-old problem in Turkey. However, the Kurdish people, who are increasingly perceived as the victim of the problem, are seen as the right party to negotiate a settlement -- an indication of the political awakening of the body politic.

In regards to the question “Can the Kurdish problem be solved without an agreement with the PKK? (Author’s note: A question that could not be asked a few years ago.), for 36 percent of the people, the answer is that it is impossible. But 49 percent believe that the Kurdish problem may be solved through a direct settlement between the government and the Kurdish people.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
18 June 2013
Butterfly effect
15 June 2013
Symbols and sensitivities
10 June 2013
Messages from Taksim Square (2)
9 June 2013
Messages from Taksim Square (1)
4 June 2013
Secularism and authority
30 May 2013
The near abroad
28 May 2013
Trouble on the horizon
26 May 2013
The unnoticed revolution
20 May 2013
Syria in the eye of the beholder
19 May 2013
Syria between a rock and a hard place
14 May 2013
Syria exploding
12 May 2013
Awakening
7 May 2013
Iraq in turmoil (1)
5 May 2013
Questions and sincerity
30 April 2013
Poisonous questions
28 April 2013
Pride and Prejudice
23 April 2013
Scenes from Central Anatolia
21 April 2013
Official vs. Civic
16 April 2013
Iraqi Turkmens
14 April 2013
Oh Kurd (2)
9 April 2013
Oh Kurd (1)
7 April 2013
Oh Turk, (2)
2 April 2013
Oh Turk,
31 March 2013
Syria and Kurds
26 March 2013
Israel's apology
24 March 2013
Time to celebrate
19 March 2013
Meltdown
17 March 2013
A new phase in globalization
12 March 2013
A day for women
10 March 2013
EU membership: realities and aspirations
5 March 2013
The leak and the aftermath
3 March 2013
Where to tap?
26 February 2013
Syrian stalemate and the tragedy of inaction
24 February 2013
Presidency and the ‘grand peace’ offer
19 February 2013
Hope and caution
17 February 2013
Political perceptions
12 February 2013
Europe vs. Asia; elite vs. public
10 February 2013
Scenarios in the Syrian conflict
5 February 2013
Assessment of political and economic trends
3 February 2013
From Brussels to Shanghai
29 January 2013
Egypt and Iran
27 January 2013
‘Open Networks, Closed Regimes’
22 January 2013
Kurdish landscape is bustling
20 January 2013
Dividends of peace
15 January 2013
Peace with the dragon
13 January 2013
Dangers ahead
8 January 2013
Changes and challenges to understanding the Kurdish problem
6 January 2013
New year, new constitution?
1 January 2013
The 8 most interesting things we learned in 2012
30 December 2012
A 2012 account of Turkish foreign policy
25 December 2012
Interesting developments
23 December 2012
Iraqi prospects in Kurdish parentheses
18 December 2012
Turkey’s popularity in the Middle East
16 December 2012
Civil war in words and deeds
11 December 2012
Suicides in the army
9 December 2012
The pro-coup makeup in our DNA
4 December 2012
The secret army
2 December 2012
Violence against women
27 November 2012
The Kurdish house
25 November 2012
After the hunger strikes
20 November 2012
Is this a war?
18 November 2012
Life is a mirror: You get what you give
13 November 2012
Remembering and contemplating Atatürk
11 November 2012
Ending hunger strikes and political folly
6 November 2012
Elections and US foreign policy debate
23 October 2012
A slightly different competition
21 October 2012
Syria tough test for goals of ex-Ottomans
16 October 2012
Strategic depth (1)
9 October 2012
On war
7 October 2012
Another name for Syria: uncertainty
2 October 2012
Regional dynamics at play at the AKP congress
30 September 2012
The AKP congress
25 September 2012
Turkey, Israel and Egypt
23 September 2012
Systemic flaws
18 September 2012
On extremism
16 September 2012
Shadow boxing
11 September 2012
Tenacity of Syrian regime
9 September 2012
Questions and prejudices
4 September 2012
The Syrian enigma
2 September 2012
A bold new world?
28 August 2012
Here we stand?
26 August 2012
Questioning the Kurdish question
21 August 2012
US elections frivolous games
19 August 2012
One more time
14 August 2012
Syrian challenges
12 August 2012
Turkey’s Kurdish imbroglio as seen from outside
7 August 2012
Brotherhood?
5 August 2012
Syria unfolding
31 July 2012
Syria and Turkey: a friendship that went astray
29 July 2012
Whither goes the regime change in Syria
24 July 2012
Two-tier war in Syria
22 July 2012
Living with the hegemon
17 July 2012
Differing official rhetoric and common problems
15 July 2012
Turkey in the Syrian ‘problem’
10 July 2012
Strangers in their own land
8 July 2012
Russia and Israel on Syria
3 July 2012
The princess and the phoenix
1 July 2012
Reciprocity
26 June 2012
An intricate strategy
24 June 2012
Egypt’s hijacked spring
...
Bloggers