Turkey wants to turn ‘downed jet crisis’ into a political opportunity
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
22 May 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 24 June 2012, Sunday 3 0 0 0
EMRE USLU
e.uslu@todayszaman.com

Turkey wants to turn ‘downed jet crisis’ into a political opportunity

Syria downed a Turkish fighter jet which was unarmed and flying over the eastern Mediterranean on Friday to test Turkish radar systems. At first Turkey shared little information. After 48 hours Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu finally came out and shared some details about how the plane was downed.

Davutoğlu said, “The downed Turkish jet was shot down in the international flight zone 13 miles outside of Syria’s flight zone.” He further noted that the jet was only tasked with a routine test of Turkey’s own radar system. In reference to Syria’s response, Davutoğlu said, “It is either amateurish behavior or ill-intention to describe the Turkish plane as a threat.”

Further, Davutoğlu revealed that Turkey has evidence that Syria knew it was a Turkish jet before it was shot down. Then Davutoğlu asked why, even if Turkey had violated Syrian airspace as Syria claimed, if Turkey was not the only country to do so in a short period of time, why didn’t Syria shoot down other countries’ jets? Perhaps Mr. Davutoğlu was referring two Israeli fighter jets that went into Syrian territory and bombed an alleged nuclear facility a few years ago. Syria did not take any action against the Israeli jets at the time.

Other than technical details, Davutoğlu made a number of points that would signal Turkey’s possible action plan against Syria. First, Davutoğlu said all options are on the table. Second, he stressed that Turkey will take action within international law. Third, he said Turkey will inform UN, NATO and Arab League states about Syria’s action. Davutoğlu mentioned in particular that he had discussed a possible action plan with Qatar’s prime minister. This detail is important because Qatar plays a critical role in the Arab Spring. Qatar’s role in the revolt against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime back in 2011 was particularly critical. Qataris were the ones who supplied arms to the opposition groups. Fourth, and most important, details about Davutoğlu’s statement revealed that Turkey will call a meeting of NATO members to discuss the crisis under Article 4 of the NATO charter.

Article 4 states, “The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.”

It seems that by consulting on the crisis under Article 4, Turkey is trying to gain some time, perhaps waiting for the American elections to be over, while escalating and internationalizing the crisis.

Given the fact that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan mentioned NATO’s possible intervention in the Syrian crisis a few months ago when Syrian forces’ bullets were fired into Turkey’s territory, Turkey will likely use the jet incident to bring NATO into the crisis.

With this strategy, it is likely that Turkey will find a real “excuse” to bring the Syrian crisis into the international arena. Erdoğan on a number of occasions has criticized the international community for ignoring the crisis in Syria. He once asked why the international community would not take action in Syria similar to what it did in Libya, positing is it because there is no oil in Syria?

The Syrian refugees in Turkey were not a good enough “excuse” for Turkey to raise its voice in the international arena. Now Turkey has that excuse. From now on you will see Turkey’s increasing attempt to push the Syrian crisis as the number one priority for the international community.

The domestic political pressure on the Turkish administration also necessitates that the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government follows such steps for two reasons. Since the last election a year ago, the AK Party government has lost its momentum in domestic politics, and as a result receives harsh criticism from various sources. Thus the AK Party, by highlighting the Syria crisis, could try to escape from domestic criticism.

Second, the AK Party government made almost identical statements when Israel killed eight Turkish citizens and one Turkish American on the Mavi Marmara in the flotilla crisis. Yet the Turkish government has not gained anything from Israel. Israel did not apologize to Turkey and did not pay compensation for the victims. It was a big blow to Turkey’s prestige in the region.

Now Turkey, knowing that the international community has already isolated Syria, will use the jet crisis as an excuse to show its “strength” and regain its prestige if it can mobilize the international community against the Assad regime and if this crisis can be a basis for removing the Syrian regime from power.

Thus it is likely that Turkey will treat this crisis as an opportunity to regain its lost prestige in the region.

COMMENTS
Davutoglu has mishandled every other policy opportunity, he'll mishandle this one as well. He's already angering the Arab nations by Turkey's focussed effort to destabilize Syria, just to earn Washington's favor. So much for Turkey being the 'model state' for other nations in the middle east!
Yaacov
1. USA did plan war against Syria: www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DJ--Z3lvaQ 2. "peaceful unarmed civilians were armed from the beginning: www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vLd_9c4WOU www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCqmI1SQB5o Advanced US anti-tank weapons from war lord Obama to its Syrian terrorists: debka.com/articl...
ellen
I agree with this article. For Erdogan, it's all about the ridiculous, fake pride and even more ridiculous prestige that country's government keeps talking about. NATO will NOT intervene. Just wait and see, all Erdogn is interested in, is adoration and admiration as though he were a God, but he's ju...
tamam
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
What did Erdoğan gain from Washington?
17 May 2013
Can we Turkify Turkish intelligence?
15 May 2013
Security weakness
10 May 2013
Why is the CHP so important for the AKP?
8 May 2013
Time for urban battle in Kurdish cities
5 May 2013
Is the MHP on the rise?
3 May 2013
Will Turkey agree to international intervention in Syria?
1 May 2013
The coming election period and the settlement process
26 April 2013
What did Karayılan ask?
24 April 2013
The PKK's new strategy: acts of civil disobedience
21 April 2013
Kurdish nationalism on the rise
19 April 2013
Freedom of Press in Turkey
17 April 2013
Skeptics and optimists
12 April 2013
Hizbullah-PKK clashes
10 April 2013
Plan B for peace
7 April 2013
Questions for wise men committee
5 April 2013
The role of the wise-man committee
3 April 2013
New moves in the solution process
31 March 2013
Finding solutions (2)
29 March 2013
Finding solutions
24 March 2013
How is peace with the PKK being made?
22 March 2013
What is in Öcalan's message
20 March 2013
Ergenekon's bomb message
17 March 2013
Something fishy going on?
15 March 2013
The Turkish flag at Nevruz celebrations?
13 March 2013
Let PKK hostages be ambassadors for peace
10 March 2013
Who will lose?
8 March 2013
Why is Erdoğan so furious?
6 March 2013
Why were the İmralı minutes leaked?
3 March 2013
Abdullah Öcalan: ‘a man of peace'
1 March 2013
MİT targets us
27 February 2013
Erdoğan and Öcalan took the right steps, but...
24 February 2013
What to make of the visit to Öcalan?
22 February 2013
What is happening in the CHP?
20 February 2013
The BDP's Black Sea trip and the violent protests
17 February 2013
Would the PKK suicide attack again?
15 February 2013
Erdoğan's new friends: generals
13 February 2013
Where is the solution process heading?
10 February 2013
Erdoğan's new enemy: the EU
6 February 2013
An open letter to the American ambassador to Turkey
3 February 2013
Causes behind DHKP/C shock among diplomats
1 February 2013
Paris killings' impact on negotiation process
30 January 2013
Ömer Güney was a courier
27 January 2013
Erdoğan considering Shanghai Five
25 January 2013
Is the PKK exhausted?
23 January 2013
Forecasting politics in 2013
20 January 2013
Abdullah Öcalan benefits from peace process
18 January 2013
Discussing the peace process
16 January 2013
Would the PKK agree with the government?
13 January 2013
Killing in Paris
9 January 2013
Sledgehammer verdicts: Professor Rodrik 'deserves' Nobel Prize
6 January 2013
PKK perspective on laying down arms
2 January 2013
Can the PKK lay down its arms?
30 December 2012
Yet again Öcalan-MİT meeting
28 December 2012
Disgusting
23 December 2012
The Patriot missiles and politics
21 December 2012
Bülent Arınç and the Kurdish portfolio
19 December 2012
Kurdish politics without Talabani
16 December 2012
Taraf, democracy and freedom of the press
14 December 2012
Washington, Syria and al-Qaeda
12 December 2012
Give that medal to Öcalan and the Oslo trumpeters!
7 December 2012
A Kurdish faction within the AKP?
5 December 2012
Bring EU process back to Turkish politics
2 December 2012
Putin's visit: What to do with him?
25 November 2012
The return of Erdoğan?
23 November 2012
Kenan Evren's confession and the Sledgehammer coup
21 November 2012
Hunger strike act: the return of Abdullah Öcalan
18 November 2012
Is Turkish-Kurdish peace on the horizon?
16 November 2012
Déjà vu
14 November 2012
Erdoğan’s way
11 November 2012
Was the chopper crash in Siirt an accident or a conspiracy?
9 November 2012
How does Öcalan think? What does he want?
7 November 2012
Obama: a Thanksgiving gift to the world
4 November 2012
PKK is winning
2 November 2012
Who recorded the Oslo meetings?
31 October 2012
Is Öcalan the right actor to solve the Kurdish problem?
28 October 2012
The Öcalan theater
24 October 2012
A storm looming after Eid
21 October 2012
Erdoğan's grave mistake
17 October 2012
The state was on the verge of shelling its own people
14 October 2012
Erdoğan's fear
10 October 2012
Political implications of Diyarbakır police chief’s statements
8 October 2012
AKP’s election strategy: 50 percent threshold
5 October 2012
What is wrong with our Syrian policy?
30 September 2012
10 years in power: the AKP as ‘perception changer'
28 September 2012
‘Peace' season has arrived once more
26 September 2012
The untold tragedies of PKK parents
23 September 2012
After the Sledgehammer trial: the defendants' strategy
20 September 2012
Where is Turkey heading?
16 September 2012
Innocence of Turks, thanks to the Ergenekon investigation
14 September 2012
Kurdish nationalists' perception of PKK violence
12 September 2012
Time to discuss a Kurdish curriculum
9 September 2012
Would a ‘wise man committee' work against the PKK?
7 September 2012
Operation against Taraf on three levels
5 September 2012
What should the AKP do against the PKK’s strategy?
2 September 2012
Turkey-Iran cold war
31 August 2012
Turkey's mistakes against the PKK (3): intelligence
29 August 2012
Turkey’s mistakes against the PKK (2): lack of understanding of PKK strategy
26 August 2012
Turkey's mistakes against the PKK: bureaucrat rotation and YAŞ meeting
24 August 2012
Can the PKK achieve its goal?
...